To best answer our original question, it might make the most sense to test for significant correlation between income and drawn nickel size. Incomes (in thousands of $) are shown for each of the 75 samples below:

Income (thousands of $)Coin size (mm)
1016
2816
3526
3422
3116
819
3018
3619
2525
3417
2118
2021
1227
1721
1824
818
1229
2326
1712
3920
1422
2622
2428
1030
3930
3419
2619
3521
2617
1120
2324
2117
2516
2121
2924
2225
3921
1827
3326
2015
7117
4319
6618
9227
9121
4720
7919
5719
4622
9421
7418
10018
5624
7825
6019
6118
9019
5822
8725
8118
4820
4713
8721
5221
7724
4815
4222
8918
5112
7417
5116
6216
5621
4117
9917


You can copy the data into Excel by highlighting the data, right-clicking and selecting Copy, then opening Excel, clicking on a blank cell, and selecting Paste from the Edit menu.

Test the claim that there is significant correlation at the 0.05 significance level. Retain at least 3 decimals on all values.

a) If we use L\displaystyle {L} to denote the low income group and H\displaystyle {H} to denote the high income group, identify the correct alternative hypothesis.



b) The r\displaystyle {r} test statistic value is:  
Hint: You may find it more convenient to use Excel's CORREL, SLOPE, and INTERCEPT functions rather than your calculator

c) The critical value is:
If your sample size falls between table values, use the smaller sample size

d) Based on this, we


e) Which means


f) The regression equation (in terms of income x\displaystyle {x}) is:
y^=\displaystyle \hat{{y}}=  

g) To predict what diameter a child would draw a nickel given family income, it would be most appropriate to: